Longer content positions better:
Dec 23, 2023 3:58:11 GMT -7
Post by account_disabled on Dec 23, 2023 3:58:11 GMT -7
The first results in Google pages have more than 1,890 words (fairly close to the 2,000 words in the previous study). The https is also linked to the presence on the 1st page. 1 image is better than none but more than one doesn't add anything in terms of performance. Page loading time remains a key element. In 2017, the developers of the SEO solution went a little further. On the one hand, they analyzed not the first 10, but the first 20 results. Then, they went even further by analyzing the first 40 results: Their analysis of the relationship between quantity of content and position in search results! More content means better rankings. No relationship between number of links and content length, but there is a relationship between better ranking and more links.
If the content further down positions better, it is also because it is more optimized, more relevant, and allows more Email Data time to be spent on the site. But in the end, in their analysis, no element really explains this situation / their hypothesis, unproven, is simply that Google rewards longer content directly in its algorithm. And we come back to the starting point of the 2012 study which assumed that Google rewarded longer content, quite simply because it appeals more to Internet users. Which is an epanadiplosis (resumption at the end of the content of the beginning content). The first results in Google pages have more than 1,890 words (fairly close to the 2,000 words in the previous study).
The https is also linked to the presence on the 1st page. 1 image is better than none but more than one doesn't add anything in terms of performance. Page loading time remains a key element. In 2017, the developers of the SEO solution went a little further. On the one hand, they analyzed not the first 10, but the first 20 results. Then, they went even further by analyzing the first 40 results: Their analysis of the relationship between quantity of content and position in search results! More content means better rankings. No relationship between number of links and content length, but there is a relationship between better ranking and more links. If the content further down positions better, it is also because it is more optimized, more relevant, and allows more time to be spent on the site.
If the content further down positions better, it is also because it is more optimized, more relevant, and allows more Email Data time to be spent on the site. But in the end, in their analysis, no element really explains this situation / their hypothesis, unproven, is simply that Google rewards longer content directly in its algorithm. And we come back to the starting point of the 2012 study which assumed that Google rewarded longer content, quite simply because it appeals more to Internet users. Which is an epanadiplosis (resumption at the end of the content of the beginning content). The first results in Google pages have more than 1,890 words (fairly close to the 2,000 words in the previous study).
The https is also linked to the presence on the 1st page. 1 image is better than none but more than one doesn't add anything in terms of performance. Page loading time remains a key element. In 2017, the developers of the SEO solution went a little further. On the one hand, they analyzed not the first 10, but the first 20 results. Then, they went even further by analyzing the first 40 results: Their analysis of the relationship between quantity of content and position in search results! More content means better rankings. No relationship between number of links and content length, but there is a relationship between better ranking and more links. If the content further down positions better, it is also because it is more optimized, more relevant, and allows more time to be spent on the site.